Finally added some solutions to the problems by updating the problem post itself.
If there are any missing which you would like to see, please comment on the problem post.
math and bridge hands and computer science and programming and puzzles and etc and etc.
Finally added some solutions to the problems by updating the problem post itself.
If there are any missing which you would like to see, please comment on the problem post.
Simplify
$$ \frac{\sqrt{10 + \sqrt{1}} + \sqrt{10 + \sqrt{2}} + \dots + \sqrt{10 + \sqrt{99}}}{\sqrt{10 - \sqrt{1}} + \sqrt{10 - \sqrt{2}} + \dots + \sqrt{10 - \sqrt{99}}}$$
Scroll down for simplified form and solution.
The expression is equal to $\sqrt{2} + 1$. Surprising!
Scroll down for solution.
Let $a + b $ = 100.
Now
$$\sqrt{10 - \sqrt{a}} \sqrt{10 + \sqrt{a}} = \sqrt{100 - a} = \sqrt{b}$$
Let $u = \sqrt{10 + \sqrt{a}}$ and $v = \sqrt{10 - \sqrt{a}}$
So $20 = u^2 + v^2$
and $\sqrt{b} = uv$
Thus
$$\sqrt{20 + 2\sqrt{b}} = \sqrt{u^2 + v^2 + 2uv} = u+v$$
Similarly
$$\sqrt{20 - 2\sqrt{b}} = \sqrt{u^2 + v^2 - 2uv} = u-v$$
Let $c \gt 0$ be a real number and $a_n$ be a sequence such that $a_0 = 1$ and $$a_{n+1} = a_n + e^{-c a_n}$$
Show that
$$\lim_{n \to \infty} (ca_n - \log n) = \log c$$
($\log$ is $\log$ to base $e$)
The Putnam problem was with $c = 1$ and only asked for proof of existence of the limit.
Scroll down for a solution.
Consider $b_n = e^{a_n}$ then we get that $b_{0} = e$ and
$$ b_{n+1} = b_n e^{1/(b_n)^c}$$
We can easily show that $a_n$ is unbounded (proof by contradiction) and so is $b_n$ and thus $\frac{1}{b_{n}^c} \to 0$.
The recurrence for $a_n$ gives us
$$b_{n+1}^c = b_{n}^c e^{c/(b_n)^c}$$
Expanding the $e^{\dots}$ part we get
$$b_{n+1}^c = b_{n}^c ( 1 + \frac{c}{b_{n}^c} + O\left(\frac{1}{b_{n}^{2c}}\right)) = b_{n}^c + c + O\left(\frac{1}{b_{n}^c}\right)$$
This telescopes to give us
$$b_{n}^c - b_{0}^c = nc + \sum_{k=0}^{n} O\left(\frac{1}{b_{k}^c}\right)$$
And so
$$\frac{b_{n}^c - b_{0}^c}{n} = c + \frac{\sum_{k=0}^{n} O\left(\frac{1}{b_{k}^c}\right)}{n}$$
Thus
$$ \frac{b_{n}^c}{n} \to c$$
Taking logarithms gives the result.
In the image above, ABCD is a square, and BX = DY, X lying on BC, and Y on CD extended.
P is the intersection point of the diagonal BD and XY.
Show that PY = PX.
(Diagram not to scale!)
Try using pure geometric methods only.
Solution diagram below:
Define $S_n$ as follows
$$ S_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n} n^{\frac{1}{k}}$$
For eg
$$S_{10} = 10 + 10^{1/2} + 10^{1/3} + \dots + 10^{1/10} \approx 25.4211$$
Find
$$ \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{S_n}{n} $$
Scroll down for a solution.
We will solve this using the arithmetic mean geometric mean inequality!
For $k \ge 2$ let $$x_1 = x_2 = \dots = x_{k-2} = 1, x_{k-1} = x_k = \sqrt{n}$$
Applying AM GM to these we get
$$\frac{k-2 + 2\sqrt{n}}{k} \ge n^{1/k} \ge 1$$
Thus
$$1 - \frac{2}{k} + 2 \frac{\sqrt{n}}{k} \ge n^{1/k} \ge 1$$
Now $\sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{1}{k} = \log n + O(1)$
Thus
$$ n-1 - 2(\log n + O(1)) + 2\sqrt{n}(\log n + O(1)) \ge \sum_{k=2}^n n^{1/k} \ge n-1$$
And so
$$ 2n-1 - 2(\log n + O(1)) + 2\sqrt{n}(\log n + O(1)) \ge \sum_{k=1}^n n^{1/k} \ge 2n-1$$
Thus
$$ 2 + O\left(\frac{\log n}{\sqrt{n}}\right) \ge \frac{S_n}{n} \ge 2 + O\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)$$
Thus $$ \frac{S_n}{n} \to 2$$
$P(x)$ is a $4^{th}$ degree polynomial with real coefficients that satisfies
$$P(x) \ge x \quad \forall x \in R$$
$$P(1) = 1, P(2) = 4, P(3) = 3$$
Find the value of $P(4)$.
Scroll down for a solution.
Let $H(x) = P(x) - x$ and so $H(x) \ge 0 \forall x \in R$. Since $H(1) = H(3) = 0$, $H(x)$ has at least two distinct roots.
Now if there was a root of $H$ different from $1$ or $3$, then we can show that $H(c) < 0 $ for some $c \in R$. If the multiplicity of $1$ of $3$ was odd, then we can again show that $H(c) < 0$ for some $c$.
Thus we must have that
$$H(x) = A(x-1)^2(x-3)^2, A > 0$$
Since $H(2) = P(2) - 2 = 2$, we get $A = 2$.
This gives $P(4) = H(4) + 4 = 2.3^2.1^2 + 4 = 22$.
Let $d_n$ be the least common multiple of $1,2, \dots, n$.
Show that
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{d_n}$$
is an irrational number.
Scroll down for a solution.
Observation 1: If $n+1$ is a power of a prime $q$, then $d_{n+1} = q d_n$, otherwise $d_{n+1} = d_n$.
Observation 2:
$$\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{a_k - 1}{a_1 a_2 \dots a_k} = 1 - \frac{1}{a_1 a_2 \dots a_n}$$
(Proof left to reader).
Let the primes in order be $p_1, p_2, \dots$.
Pick an arbitrary prime $p = p_m$ and consider for $n \ge p$
$$f_n = \frac{d_{n}}{d_{p-1}}$$
The observation 1 above also holds for $f_n$.
Note that $f_{p_j} \ge p_m p_{m+1} \dots p_{j}$ and that the inequality is strict for infinitely many $p_j$.
Now consider $$ \sum_{p_i \le k < p_{i+1}} \frac{1}{f_k}$$
By Bertrands' theorem of a prime between $n$ and $2n$ we have that $p_{i+1} < 2p_i$
and thus
$$ \sum_{p_i \le k < p_{i+1}} \frac{1}{f_k} \le \frac{p_{i+1} - p_i}{f_{p_{i}}} \le \frac{p_i - 1}{f_{p_{i}}}$$
Since $f_{p_j} \ge p_m p_{m+1} \dots p_{j}$ we get
$$ \sum_{p_i \le k < p_{i+1}} \frac{1}{f_k} \le \frac{p_i - 1}{p_m p_{m+1} \dots p_i}$$
And so (note inequality is strict, because $f_{p_j} \gt p_m p_{m+1} \dots p_{j}$ infinitely often.)
$$\sum_{n \ge p} \frac{1}{f_n} < \sum_{j \ge m} \frac{p_j - 1}{p_m \dots p_j}$$
By Observation 2 above we get
$$\sum_{n \ge p} \frac{1}{f_n} < 1$$
Now if $$\frac{a}{b} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{d_n}$$
Pick a prime $p > b$ and consider $\frac{a d_{p-1}}{b}$ and use the above result about $f$.
$a,b,c$ are real numbers such that
$$a + b + c = 2022$$
and
$$\frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c} = \frac{1}{2022}$$
What are the possible values of
$$\frac{1}{a^{2023}} + \frac{1}{b^{2023}} + \frac{1}{c^{2023}} $$
Try to keep the algebraic manipulations to a minimum.
[Solution]
I was given this puzzle by Arvind Hariharan and he has a write up with a different solution approach here: https://www.starvind.com/math/hats-to-leave-you-scratching-your-head/.
The puzzle (apparently from Riddler) is as follows:
Four people are trying to escape from a room. Guards have placed a hat on each person’s head, and each hat is one of three colors: red, yellow or blue. The four people are arranged at the vertices of a square, with an obstacle in the middle. Each person can see the hats on the heads of those on adjacent vertices of the square, but they cannot see the hat of the person diagonally across from them. They also do not know the color of the hat on their own head.
Each person must guess the color of the hat on their own head. If at least one person guesses correctly, they can all escape the room together. No communication is allowed once the hats are placed on their heads, but they can coordinate on a strategy beforehand. They also know how they will be arranged in the square.
How can they be guaranteed to escape the room?
Please stop reading if you wish to solve the puzzle by yourself.
The reason for writing this article is to discuss a strange approach to solving this problem: Giving a proof of existence of a strategy using Linear Algebra!
Since there are $3$ colours, we can work mod $3$, with $0, 1, 2$ being the colours and $x + y = x + y \mod 3$ (This is the field $\mathbb{F}_3$). Note that $2x = -x$ etc.
Let us assume the four people are $A,B,C,D$ and they are given the hat colours $a, b, c, d$, with $A,C$ and $B,D$ being diagonally opposite. Thus $A$ and $C$ only have access to $b,d$ and $B, D$ only have access to $a, c$.
Let us further assume that there is strategy where each person computes some linear combination of the colours they can see and uses it as their guess.
For eg: $A$ guesses $x_a b + y_a d$ for some $x_a, y_b$ specific to $A$.
Now introduce the offset variable $\delta_a$ which is the amount $A$'s guess is off from their actual value. i.e.
$$ \delta_a = x_a b+ y_a d - a = x_a b + y_a d + 2a$$
Writing this equation for each of $A,B,C,D$ we see that the $\delta$'s can be captured as a matrix equation as follows
$$S \begin{bmatrix}a\\ b \\ c \\ d\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\delta_a \\ \delta_b \\ \delta_c \\ \delta_d \end{bmatrix} $$
where $S$ (short for strategy) is the 4x4 matrix
$$ \begin{bmatrix} 2 & x_a & 0 & y_a\\ x_b & 2 & y_b & 0\\ 0 & x_c & 2 & y_c\\x_d & 0 & y_d & 2 \end{bmatrix}$$
$S$ is a viable strategy if for every possible $a,b, c, d$, the atleast one of the $\delta$'s is $0$.
Now comes the key observation:
Lemma 1: For any $x, y$ at least one of $x, y, x + y, x+2y$ is $0$ (note $\mathbb{F}_3$ working mod 3). This is easily proved.
This fact can be stated in linear algebra terms
Lemma 2: Each vector in the space spanned by $u = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ and $v = \begin{bmatrix}0 & 1 & 1 & 2 \end{bmatrix}$ has at least one co-ordinate which is $0$, i.e. for any $x, y$, the vector $xu + yv$ has at least one co-ordinate which is $0$.
Lemma 3: Now notice that if you now have two arbitrary values $p$ and $q$ and you wanted a 1x4 vector with one of the coordinates as $p$ and other as $q$ (in some given positions), you can find (a unique) vector of the form $w = x u + y v$ which has co-ordinates $p$ and $q$ in the given positions (the other two coordinates are not "free"), as you are essentially solving $x + y = p, x + 2y = q$ or some such pair of equations from Lemma 1.
Now look at the columns of $S$
$$ \begin{bmatrix} 2 & x_a & 0 & y_a\\ x_b & 2 & y_b & 0\\ 0 & x_c & 2 & y_c\\x_d & 0 & y_d & 2 \end{bmatrix}$$
Each column has $0$ and $2$ in some positions, thus by Lemma 3, there is an $S$ where each column of $S$ can be written as a vector of the form $x u + y v$.
Thus we see that for such an $S$, the offset vector $\begin{bmatrix}\delta_a \\ \delta_b \\ \delta_c \\ \delta_d \end{bmatrix}$, which is essentially a linear combination of the columns of $S$ is thus also a linear combination of $u$ and $v$ and by Lemma 2, has to have at least one co-ordinate which is $0$.
Hence such an $S$ is a strategy which solves the puzzle. This $S$ can actually be computed easily, which we will leave to the reader.
Note that this generalizes, for example you could have a strategy for 6 people with 5 colours where each person could see all but one.
Let $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n$ be $n \ge 1$ distinct odd integers with no prime factors $\gt 5$.
Show that
$$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{a_n} \lt \frac{15}{8}$$
[Solution]